Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
Home
SIMville
Resources for SIM Professional Developers

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Scientific Argumentation
Scientific Argumentation Book
Author(s): Janis A. Bulgren, James D. Ellis

Publication Info: University of Kansas, 2015

Scientific Argumentation Resources:

VIDEO

  • 2016 SIM Conference: Scientific Argumentation - Jan Bulgren, Jim Ellis
  • 2018 SIM Conference: Strengthening Student Reasoning with Scientific Argumentation - Janice Creneti Handouts: Comparison Table: Theory/Law, CERs and 5 E's, Concept Diagram Like Terms, FRAME: Parts of all CERs, Paticipant Agenda, session presentation
  • 2017 KUCRL Conference: Leveraging the Power of Scientific Argumentation Across Content Areas - April Maitner, Janice Creneti  Agenda
  • 2015 SIM Conference: Scientific Argumentation - Jan Bulgren, Jim Ellis

PPTs

  • Scientific Argumentation Routine presentation (ppt)
  • Scientific Argumentation Routine blank device (ppt)

MORE

  • Access Florida SPDG LiveBinder Assets (Key: CE SA)
  • Access Content Enhancement Routine Checklists
  • Description of the Scientific Argumentation Routine from the SIM website

MICROCREDENTIALS

  • Professional Learning
  • Fidelity of Implementation
  • Specialist

STRATENOTES

Assets from FLORIDA SPDG Livebinders:

Teacher can access Florida Live Binder assets. Share this link and password:

https://www.livebinders.com/play/play_shared_binder/2028256?play_view=play Password CE SA

Cue Do Review

The overall instructional process that guides use of the CE device with the Routine’s Linking Steps.  This instructional process involves:

Cue:  teacher announces the CE routine and explains its use, how it will help students and expectations for student participation

Do: teacher and class collaboratively construct the device using the Linking Steps that “connect” the content to the needs and goals of students

Review: Information presented in the device is reviewed and confirmed, use of the device is reviewed and confirmed, use of the device as a learning and study tool is modeled

The Cue Do Review Frame

Cue Do Review Checklist

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfwOSwyAwyA

The Routine

Teaching ppt

Device Templates

Fillable pdf

PPT file

Device Checklist

Checklist

Examples

There are 4 devices in the guidebook Bone Loss in Women, Intelligence in Amoeba, Vaccines and Autism, Relationship of change in temperature and water mass.

NWP Tree Octopus

Exposure to PFOA

Low carb and low fat diets

Fracking

Deforestation and disease

Human impact on climate change

Implementation Checklist

Fillable

Research Version

Qualifers Cue Card

Qualifiers

Section Rubrics

Rubric

Sample Articles

Where to find articles

NewsELA: https://newsela.com/ is a source of articles that can be customized for greade level, ELA standard, and topic.

Science Daily for shorter articles:  https://www.sciencedaily.com/  Allows you to search by subject area, also try narrowing the search even farther by typing "study" into the search box.

Autism Article

Chemical Exposure and Breastfeeding

Fluorescent Jellyfish

Gene Link to Psychiatric Disorder

Osprey and DDT

Students and Fake News

Twins and Gut Microbes

Viruses and Gender

Zika Virus

Literacy Connections

Science and Literacy Standards

Literacy Anchor Standards

Probing Questions

Probing Questions

Other CERs as Scaffolds

Comparison Table: Scientific Theory and Scientific Law

Research

  • The argumentation and evaluation guide: encouraging NGSS-based critical thinking.(TEACHER'S TOOLKIT) Science Scope, 2015, Vol.38(7), p.78 [Peer Reviewed Journal] Bulgren, Janis ; Ellis, James
  • The Effectiveness of Reason Racer, a Game Designed to Engage Middle School Students in Scientific Argumentation Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 01 January 2015, Vol.47(1), p.21-40 [Peer Reviewed Journal] Ault, Marilyn ; Craig-Hare, Jana ; Frey, Bruce ; Ellis, James D. ; Bulgren, Janis
  • The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, Vol.23(1), pp.82-97 [Peer Reviewed Journal] Bulgren, Janis; Ellis, James; Marquis, Janet
  • Social Media: How the next generation can practice argumentation, Educational media international, 2017-04-03, Vol. 54(2), p. 99-111, Roland, Amber; Craig-Hare, Jana; Ault, Marilyn; Ellis, James; Bulgren, Janis
The University of Kansas
KU Center for Research on Learning
1200 Sunnyside Ave, Haworth 3107
Lawrence, Kansas 66045
simpd@ku.edu
785-864-0626

Search form

The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression, and genetic information in the university's programs and activities. Retaliation is also prohibited by university policy. The following persons have been designated to handle inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policies and are the Title IX coordinators for their respective campuses: Associate Vice Chancellor for the Office of Civil Rights and Title IX, civilrights@ku.edu, Room 1082, Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045, 785-864-6414, 711 TTY (for the Lawrence, Edwards, Parsons, Yoder, and Topeka campuses); Director, Equal Opportunity Office, Mail Stop 7004, 4330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Fairway, KS 66205, 913-588-8011, 711 TTY (for the Wichita, Salina, and Kansas City, Kansas medical center campuses). 

The University of Kansas is a public institution governed by the Kansas Board of Regents.

User account menu

  • Log in

Footer menu

  • Contact
Clear keys input element