Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
Home
SIMville
Resources for SIM Professional Developers

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Quality Assignment Routine
Quality Assignment Routine Book
Author(s): Joyce A. Rademacher, Donald D. Deshler, Jean B. Schumaker, and B. Keith Lenz

Publication Info: Edge Enterprises, 1998
 

Quality Assignment Routine Resources:

VIDEO

PPTs

  • Quality Assignment Routine presentation (ppt)
  • Quality Assignment Routine blank devices 

MORE

  • Access Florida SPDG LiveBinder Assets (Key: CE QAR)
  • Access Content Enhancement Routine Checklists
  • Description of the Quality Assignment Routine from the SIM website

MICROCREDENTIALS

  • Professional Learning
  • Fidelity of Implementation
  • Specialist

Strategram/Stratenotes

  • Strategram Vol 6, No. 4 April, 1994: A Quality Assignment Routine - Planning High Quality Assignments
  • Strategram Vol 6, No. 5 June 1994: Quality Assignment Routine Part 2: Explaining and Evaluating High Quality Assignments

 

Assets from FLORIDA SPDG Livebinders:

Teacher can access Florida Live Binder assets. Share this link and password:

https://www.livebinders.com/play/play_shared_binder/2201526?play_view=play  Password CE QAR

Cue Do Review

The overall instructional process that guides use of the CE device with the Routine’s Linking Steps.  This instructional process involves:

Cue:  teacher announces the CE routine and explains its use, how it will help students and expectations for student participation

Do: teacher and class collaboratively construct the device using the Linking Steps that “connect” the content to the needs and goals of students

Review: Information presented in the device is reviewed and confirmed, use of the device is reviewed and confirmed, use of the device as a learning and study tool is modeled

The Cue Do Review Frame

Cue Do Review Checklist

The Routine

Teaching presentation

Device Templates

For students

For teachers

Device Checklist

Planning Checklist

Examples

World History

English Assignment

REACT Strategy Cue Card

REACT

PACE Cue Card

PACE

PLAN Chart Guidance for Teacher

Planning Chart

Research

  • Quality Assignment Routine Research slide
  • Lenz, B.K., Bulgren, J.A., & Hudson, P. (1990). Content enhancement: A model for promoting the acquisition of content by individuals with learning disabilities. In T.E. Scruggs & B.Y.L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 122-165). New York: Springer-Verlag. This book chapter discusses information processing and pedagogy for students with learning disabilities, including suggestions for teacher planning and teaching routines such as the Chapter Survey Routine, Concept Teaching Routine, and Assignment Completion Routine.
  • Rademacher, J.A. (1999). Enhancing assignment completion for academically diverse learners. In D.D. Deshler, J.B. Schumaker, K.R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Teaching every adolescent every day: Learning in diverse middle and high school classrooms (pp. 146-206). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books. This book chapter discusses the planning of high-quality assignments, improving the nature of secondary assignments to students, presenting assignments with students, and technology as a tool for enhancing assignment completion.
  • Rademacher, J.A. (2000). Involving students in assignment evaluation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(3), 151-156. This article describes the relationships among the planning, presenting, and evaluating components of the assignment completion process, then provides guidelines for using the Quality Assignment Routine's PACE 1,2,... self-checking process.
  • Rademacher, J.A., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1996). Development and validation of a classroom assignment routine for inclusive settings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19(3), 163-178. Multiple-probe and comparison-group designs are used in combination to (a) identify and explore high-quality classroom assignments from the perspective of inclusion teachers and students (LD and non-LD) and (b) determine the effects of the Quality Assignment Completion Routine on content teachers' planning, explanation, and evaluation of assignments.
  • Rademacher, J., Tyler-Wood, T., Doclar, J., & Pemberton, J. (2001). Developing learner-centered technology assignments with student teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(3), 18-25. This article describes a project in which technology experts worked with university faculty and student teachers to infuse technology into high-quality assignments incorporating aspects of the Quality Assignment Routine.
The University of Kansas
KU Center for Research on Learning
1200 Sunnyside Ave, Haworth 3107
Lawrence, Kansas 66045
simpd@ku.edu
785-864-0626

Search form

The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression, and genetic information in the university's programs and activities. Retaliation is also prohibited by university policy. The following persons have been designated to handle inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policies and are the Title IX coordinators for their respective campuses: Associate Vice Chancellor for the Office of Civil Rights and Title IX, civilrights@ku.edu, Room 1082, Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045, 785-864-6414, 711 TTY (for the Lawrence, Edwards, Parsons, Yoder, and Topeka campuses); Director, Equal Opportunity Office, Mail Stop 7004, 4330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Fairway, KS 66205, 913-588-8011, 711 TTY (for the Wichita, Salina, and Kansas City, Kansas medical center campuses). 

The University of Kansas is a public institution governed by the Kansas Board of Regents.

User account menu

  • Log in

Footer menu

  • Contact
Clear keys input element