Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
Home
SIMville
Resources for SIM Professional Developers

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Concept Comparison Routine
Concept Comparison Routine
Author(s): Janis A. Bulgren, Jean B. Schumaker, and Donald D. Deshler

Publication Info: Edge Enterprises, 1995

Concept Comparison Resources:

VIDEO

  • 2014 Content Enhancement Devices as Essay Writing Supports m- Jan Bulgren  Video
  • 2013 Content Enhancment Devices as Essay Writing Supports Video
  • 2005 SIM Conference Video: CD's: Concept Anchoring, Concept Comparison, Question Exploration, BUILD, LEARN,, Taking Notes Together, Strategic Tutoring? VIDEO
  • 2006 SIM Conference Video: CDs for Strategic Tutoring, The Concept Routines and Question Exploration Video
  • Preconference 2010: Enhancing CERS: Guidebooks on Integrating CE Routines in Core and Elective Classes - Bev Colombo, Suzanne Robinson Video

PPTs

  • Concept Comparison Routine presentation (ppt) NEW 2021
  • Concept Comparison Routine blank devices 
  • Concept Comparison devices - Minarik (google share, you must log in to google to access)
  • Comparison Table google slide: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1AcAWH2wgTnL8gnsYyFICApWGGjENYinLgj1PtVFiQjY/copy?usp=sharing 

MORE

  • Access Florida SPDG LiveBinder Assets (Key: CE CC)
  • Access Content Enhancement Routine Checklists
  • Description of Concept Comparison Routine from the SIM website
  • Self-Guided Professional Development with the CC Multi Media Program, Guidebook and Coaching
  • PD Packet
  • A different overview ppt
  • Try Some Concept Ladders/Pyramids for your Own Content Area activity
  • Notes on the Concept Comparison Routine

MICROCREDENTIALS

  • Professional Learning
  • Fidelity of Implementation
  • Specialist

Stratenotes and Strategram

  • Strategram Vol. 14, No. 4, June 2002: Concept Comparison
  • Stratenotes Vol. 7, No. 7, April 1999: Comparing the Concept Routines
  • Strategram Vol. 20, No. 4, Concept Comparison e-Learning Program
     
  • Description of the Concept Anchoring Routine from the SIM website

Assets from FLORIDA SPDG Livebinders:

Teacher can access Florida Live Binder assets. Share this link and password:

https://www.livebinders.com/play/play_shared_binder/800257?play_view=play Password CE CC

Cue Do Review

The overall instructional process that guides use of the CE device with the Routine’s Linking Steps.  This instructional process involves:

Cue:  teacher announces the CE routine and explains its use, how it will help students and expectations for student participation

Do: teacher and class collaboratively construct the device using the Linking Steps that “connect” the content to the needs and goals of students

Review: Information presented in the device is reviewed and confirmed, use of the device is reviewed and confirmed, use of the device as a learning and study tool is modeled

The Cue Do Review Frame

Cue Do Review Checklist

The Routine

Teaching ppt (pdf)

The Concept Comparison Routine gives teachers an instructional tool that trumps any Venn Diagram.  Not only do students learn a systematic process for identifying similarities and differences, but it teaches them how to summarize the key points- the ticket to  remembering and applying.  This is a great tool for all content areas.

 

Device Templates

3 concept template ppt

2 concept (portrait)

Landscape (2 and 5 concepts)

 
Device Checklist

Device Checklist

Examples

Figurative Language

Forms of DNA (3 Concept)

Growth Curves (2 Concept

Linear vs Quadratic Functions

Formulas for Slope

Types of Economies

Types of Government

Implementation Checklist

Implementation Checklist

Research

  • Concept Comparison Routine Research slide
  • Bulgren, J.A., Lenz, B.K., Schumaker, J.B., Deshler, D.D., & Marquis, J.G. (2002). The use and effectiveness of a comparison routine in diverse secondary content classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 356-371. This article reports the results of two studies of the Concept Comparison Routine: Study 1 provides evidence that students benefit from use of the routine and graphic organizer device, and Study 2 provides evidence that teachers can learn to use the device quickly.
  • Schumaker, J.B., Fisher, J.B., & Walsh, L.D. (2010). The effects of a computerized professional development program on teachers and students with and without disabilities in secondary general education classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 111-131. Two studies indicate a computerized Concept Comparison Routine professional development program was at least as effective as a face-to-face workshop on measures of teacher learning and student results.
  • Bulgren. J., & Scanlon, D. (1997). Instructional routines and learning strategies that promote understanding of content area concepts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(4), 292-302. This article provides examples of using content enhancement routines (Concept Diagram, Comparison Table, ORDER) to promote an understanding of middle and secondary school content area concepts.
  • Schumaker, J. B., & Fisher, J. B. (in press). 35 years on the road from research to practice: A review of studies on four Content Enhancement Routines for inclusive subject-area classes, Part I. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. Advance online publication. 1 -16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12258

The University of Kansas
KU Center for Research on Learning
1200 Sunnyside Ave, Haworth 3107
Lawrence, Kansas 66045
simpd@ku.edu
785-864-0626

Search form

The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression, and genetic information in the university's programs and activities. Retaliation is also prohibited by university policy. The following persons have been designated to handle inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policies and are the Title IX coordinators for their respective campuses: Associate Vice Chancellor for the Office of Civil Rights and Title IX, civilrights@ku.edu, Room 1082, Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045, 785-864-6414, 711 TTY (for the Lawrence, Edwards, Parsons, Yoder, and Topeka campuses); Director, Equal Opportunity Office, Mail Stop 7004, 4330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Fairway, KS 66205, 913-588-8011, 711 TTY (for the Wichita, Salina, and Kansas City, Kansas medical center campuses). 

The University of Kansas is a public institution governed by the Kansas Board of Regents.

User account menu

  • Log in

Footer menu

  • Contact
Clear keys input element